LAW · EVIDENCE · TECHNOLOGY
Research you can
inspect and reproduce.
A public workbench for legal evidence, institutional accountability and experimental research tools.
Start with a fictional example. Follow a claim to its source, inspect what changed, and examine the recorded result.
Building an agent workflow? Start with the agent guide for documented interfaces, examples and attribution. Read the catalogue as JSON, including selected Learning with Bert video records.
THE RECORDED DEMONSTRATION
What changes when a source changes?
Choose a scenario, inspect the claim and its cited passage, then examine the recorded checks. Selecting a scenario displays an existing execution record; it does not run a new legal assessment.
YOUR LOCAL ANNOTATION
Record what you would check next.
Your notes stay in this browser until you download them. They do not alter the source files, the recorded results or the example's review labels.
Structural checks can expose gaps and changes. They cannot determine whether a passage substantively supports a legal proposition.
RESEARCH GUIDE
What would you like to work on?
This is a curated guide to the published examples and documentation. Every route leads to a source you can inspect.
The guide will appear when the public catalog has loaded.
PUBLIC RESEARCH & TOOLS
Find the work that fits your question.
Explore the experimental projects, published scholarship and teaching materials. Each entry links to its source and describes its present scope.
Library updates
Checking update recordSources and update history
A successful update retrieves source records. Inspection dates describe the recorded review scope; neither label certifies full-text or legal accuracy.
MUSIC & LEARNING
Watch and listen with Bert.
Bert Chan (陳信宏) shares music and Learning with Bert on one YouTube channel. Choose a collection or explore the channel. If you enjoy what you find, subscribe on YouTube to follow new uploads.
Discuss a learning session. Interested in a small-group session on legal pluralism? See the existing enquiry route. Scope, availability and any fee would be agreed before a booking.
FOLLOW THE RECORD
What was actually checked?
Inspect the source revisions, commands, expected outcomes and captured output behind the selected scenario. An expected rejection is shown as a rejection, rather than a successful validation.
Verification records will appear when the recorded example has loaded.
HELP TEST THE WORK
Tell us where the evidence stops being clear.
A useful report describes the task you tried, the step that became unclear, and what you expected to happen. Independent use and reproduction are recorded when they occur.
The feedback form opens a public GitHub issue. Use fictional or non-confidential examples.